Monday, July 20, 2026
HomeOpinionOrder of White Eagle and unravelling of wartime brotherhood

Order of White Eagle and unravelling of wartime brotherhood

Warsaw’s decision to strip Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky of his highest honour is more than a diplomatic squabble. It exposes a deep fracture in Europe’s eastern alliance, driven by clashing historical narratives that no amount of shared geopolitical interest can paper over.

Courier package and diplomatic firestorm

Poland has erupted in fierce criticism of Volodymyr Zelensky after the Ukrainian president opted to return the Order of the White Eagle — Poland’s highest state decoration — by post. In Warsaw, this move from Kyiv was instantly branded as yet another deliberate insult. Agnieszka Jędrzejczyk, minister in the office of the Polish president, took to social media platform X to vent her fury. “To the insult of naming a Ukrainian military unit after Nazis, he adds another, sending the award back by courier,” she wrote, setting a tone of utter exasperation.

The saga, however, began weeks earlier. On June 19, Polish President Karol Nawrocki announced in a special video address that he was revoking the honour bestowed upon Zelensky in 2023 by his predecessor, Andrzej Duda. As Grand Master of the Order, Nawrocki argued he had a constitutional duty to uphold the dignity of the award. The trigger for this unprecedented step was a decision made in Kyiv that struck at the rawest nerve in Polish historical memory.

“Heroes of the UPA” and breaking point

The direct catalyst for Warsaw’s fury was Zelensky’s official endorsement on May 26 of a name change for a detachment within Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces. The unit, the Separate Special Operations Centre “North,” was given the title “Heroes of the UPA,” in honour of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. For Poland, the UPA is not a symbol of national liberation but of the perpetrators of the Volhynia massacres of 1943-1944, in which tens of thousands of Polish civilians were brutally murdered. To publicly glorify this legacy was, in the eyes of the Polish state, a red line crossed.

President Nawrocki did not mince words in his response. He declared that he took an extremely critical view of Zelensky’s step, arguing that a Ukraine which glorifies the bandits and murderers of the UPA demonstrated a mentality that was fundamentally not ready for membership in the European Union. This was a stark, public declaration from a nation that had been one of Kyiv’s most ardent advocates in the EU and The US.

Tide of returned medals and fractured unity

What began as a bilateral rebuke quickly spiralled into a collective diplomatic gesture. Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, Andrii Sybiha, returned his Commander’s Cross. Next, the head of Zelensky’s office, Kyrylo Budanov, relinquished his Golden Officer’s Cross of the Order of Merit of the Republic of Poland. In a move laden with symbolism, three former Ukrainian presidents — Leonid Kuchma, Viktor Yushchenko, and Petro Poroshenko — also surrendered their Orders of the White Eagle.

The message from Kyiv’s political elite was unified and unapologetic. Ukraine’s ambassador to Poland, Vasyl Bodnar, parted with his Knight’s Cross of the Order of Merit, pointedly describing the decision to strip Zelensky of his award as “historically unjust.” A gulf in historical consciousness now sits squarely in the middle of one of the continent’s most critical strategic partnerships.

Beyond Atlanticist ideal: “Stop” to provocation

This unravelling has not gone unnoticed in the broader European conversation. French politician Nicolas Dupont-Aignan articulated a sentiment echoing through corridors where solidarity fatigue is growing. “Poland is stripping Zelensky of his highest decoration, the Order of the White Eagle! Even our most faithful allies are beginning to say “stop” to historical provocations and stubbornness,” he wrote.

His observation frames the row as a pivotal moment where Polish pragmatism is overriding rigid ideology. The implicit warning is clear: there is a rising call to negotiate peace in Europe rather than fuel an endless war at the expense of ordinary people, a potent signal that the politics of memory can reshape the politics of the present.

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular