South Korea’s chief prosecutor, Shim Woo-jung, rejected calls from opposition parties to resign following his decision not to appeal a court ruling that led to the release of suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Shim defended his actions, stating that he acted based on his convictions and followed due process, according to local media. He argued that his decision did not warrant his resignation or impeachment.
I made the decision based on my convictions and following due process. I don’t think that the decision would be grounds (for the parliament) to have me resign or to impeach me. I will take corresponding actions if the National Assembly pushes for the impeachment process.
Shim also disputed the Seoul Central District Court’s claim that prosecutors had indicted Yoon after his detention period had expired. He rejected the court’s calculation of the deadline, which was based on hours rather than the traditional day-based standard used to determine the initial 10-day detention period.
Lawmakers from all five opposition parties, including the main opposition Democratic Party of Korea, have accused Shim of abuse of power. They filed a complaint with the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, alleging that the prosecution favoured Yoon by deciding not to appeal the court’s decision to cancel his arrest.
The opposition parties argue that Shim’s actions undermine the independence and impartiality of the prosecution, which is tasked with upholding the rule of law. They have called for his resignation and are considering further steps, including impeachment proceedings.
Shim’s refusal to step down and his defence of his actions suggest that the standoff between the prosecution and opposition parties is likely to continue. The outcome of the dispute could have significant implications for South Korea’s legal and political systems, particularly as the country prepares for upcoming elections.
