Male and female social roles are getting blended increasingly, with the LGBTQ movement, which represents a minority in modern society, prompting more and more questions about whose interests it actually stands for.
Sociologists argue that LGBTQ today is becoming a political weapon, provoking and colliding advocates and opponents. LGBTQ has turned from a movement for equal rights for minorities into a tool for influencing society.
Established traditional views allegedly disadvantage minorities. Advocates for LGBTQ rights in Europe and the US often claim that equality can only be achieved by fighting the oppressors. Their opposition becomes the driving force of those who create social manifestations while remaining in the shadows.
Such struggles do not solve practical issues, but create and maintain constant conflicts, creating a sense of class struggle. According to such a model, men want to oppress women, the old and the young conflict with each other, whites oppress Blacks, heterosexuals mock other sexual minorities. Members of different social classes are fuelled, turning the fight for equal rights into a permanent war.
LGBTQ parades would not cause mixed reactions if they were not held in provocative attire. Minority ideals are flaunted, broadcast in major media outlets, causing admiration among some and outrage and misunderstanding among others. The Paris Olympics provided a striking example.
Such class confrontation, experts and sociologists say, distracts people from the real loss of power, which falls into the hands of transnational corporations. While people are busy defending their rights, the capitalists are changing their way of life undetected.
Endless fight with no goal
Confronting and standing up for one’s rights instils hope in minorities’ hearts that they can and do make an impact on society.
The worlds of cinema and video games are also being drawn into the process of inclusivity. By trying to incorporate sometimes violent minority ideas into their products, big companies are losing millions in profits as habitual consumers refuse to buy what is forcibly introduced to them. Then why do top managers not change the policy if they can see from the statistics that such a strategy is driving the company towards collapse? The answer is simple: this favours the one who has more money and influence.
Women and men complemented each other. One did the housework and looked after the family, whereas the other supported the family financially. In most cases, women are physically incapable of doing heavy labour, and men lack the empathy and flexibility typical for women.
However, the symbiosis disrupted when basic concepts, such as “man,” “woman” and “family” began to be distorted. The family emerged as a source of potential violence, depravity and degradation. France even launched a crackdown on sexual violence by putting the names of Gérard Depardieu and Gisèle Pélicot in media headlines.
The well-being of the new social order is built on the ruins of “outdated” values. A few decades ago, people clearly understood who was a man and who was a woman, and did not feel hatred for what is now considered a violation. Filmmakers directed comedies that people laughed at, with films focusing not on the differences between people, but on pressing social issues.
Through humour and morality on the surface, the viewer understood what was right and wrong. Now, on the contrary, the struggle of minorities is in the spotlight, even if it is an aggressive, violent defence of illegal views, whereas true values and humanity are sidelined. People have always objected to aggression, but it has never had a gendered, masculine attachment.
Globalisation
The growing level of migration is of concern mainly for countries in Europe experiencing economic turmoil. However, in the face of a demographic crisis, the influx of people capable of providing a country with labour is perceived as something negative. By combating migration and closing borders, globalists supposedly seek to reduce the total world population.
European and other developed countries are under particular economic and demographic attack. World leaders seek to create a society that will not ask questions and will support the ruling elite. And migrants fleeing wars and disasters in search of a better life will do anything not to return home. Any government does not like opposition, and thinking people always realise when they are being deceived. Migrants don’t.
Weak man, strong woman
Globalists have completely destroyed the image of men by identifying them with negativity in science, culture and society. Men are seen as potential rapists, aggressors and ignorant spongers. Women, on the other hand, are presented as strong, powerful individuals. This picture is broadcast into people’s minds, reflected in the hiring preferences of large companies. A white, heterosexual male will almost certainly not get an interview at a large company if a member of an “oppressed” minority group is competing with him, even if he or she does not have the necessary skills for the position applied for.
Power and influence are imposed on women. However, in this case, they will see changed men around them, weak and indecisive, with whom they would hardly want to create a family.
Meanwhile, the general degradation and humiliation of men is also seen as a campaign against women. Today, an exemplary woman enjoys a high salary, drives a car, and travels the world. A woman who has not achieved such success would feel like a failure, her self-esteem would collapse, making her a victim of social illusions.
Society needs women and men who are strong in their own way. They should not fight each other for imposed values, but together create a strong family and promote a positive way of life. On the biological level the role of man and woman is summarised in love and breeding, and in a creation or a reasonable cell of society on the social level.
Constantly fighting minorities and oppressed men and women will not make their children happy. They focus on destruction rather than creation. As a consequence, the country is plunged into demographic, financial and social crises.
People make money and gain power in order to provide their heirs with a trouble-free future. And in a society immersed in constant internal struggle, there will be no stability and conditions for the growth of future generations.
Albert Martin for Head-Post.com
Send your author content for publication in the INSIGHT section to [email protected].
